![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
So, the kinky paper:
Her argument was based on Victor Turner's idea of liminal spaces and the dichotomy of structure and communitas. Basically, hierarchical, or at least dichotomous, power relations form the structure for the community, and the communitas arises in the space opened by that framework. She talked about a scene as a liminal space; the top is the facilitator and the bottom is a liminal entity. Her argument for the scene as a ritual activity followed from there; toys are like magical objects which can become contaminated (both in a purportedly biomedical sense and through things as simple as being touched by another person). Subspace (and to a lesser extent topspace, and why is subspace accepted by firefox's dictionary?) is a trance state, which she related to Turner's "powers of the weak." She also discussed neophytes, switches, and queers as liminal figures within a liminal society. Their status is in question; while their status may become crystallized, as with neophytes and people recognized as "true switches", it may remain liminal indefinitely.
There were a couple issues with it. I thought her description of queers in the community was a little... confusing, and it didn't really jive with what I've experienced. She referred to it as "an intense form of switching", and I can see what she was going for and am sure the term is used that way in the community she studied; it just isn't my experience of that term. On the whole, also, I felt she could have gone deeper. Liminality is a great framework for describing scenes, but it's also kind of obvious. But, that's a function of giving a fifteen minute talk at eight in the morning for a bunch of people who are not walking around holding leashes.
But, overall, it was a good talk. She was very sensitive to community issues and avoided essentializing language (except, of course, the essentalizing language used by the community itself). If anybody's interested, I'm happy to email the author and ask her if she wouldn't mind sending me a copy of her paper.
(And I'm afraid to ask this, but... what do you use a blood pressure cuff for in the context of a scene? Is it for what I think it's for. Because, damn.
It does not help that I am really scared of them.)
Her argument was based on Victor Turner's idea of liminal spaces and the dichotomy of structure and communitas. Basically, hierarchical, or at least dichotomous, power relations form the structure for the community, and the communitas arises in the space opened by that framework. She talked about a scene as a liminal space; the top is the facilitator and the bottom is a liminal entity. Her argument for the scene as a ritual activity followed from there; toys are like magical objects which can become contaminated (both in a purportedly biomedical sense and through things as simple as being touched by another person). Subspace (and to a lesser extent topspace, and why is subspace accepted by firefox's dictionary?) is a trance state, which she related to Turner's "powers of the weak." She also discussed neophytes, switches, and queers as liminal figures within a liminal society. Their status is in question; while their status may become crystallized, as with neophytes and people recognized as "true switches", it may remain liminal indefinitely.
There were a couple issues with it. I thought her description of queers in the community was a little... confusing, and it didn't really jive with what I've experienced. She referred to it as "an intense form of switching", and I can see what she was going for and am sure the term is used that way in the community she studied; it just isn't my experience of that term. On the whole, also, I felt she could have gone deeper. Liminality is a great framework for describing scenes, but it's also kind of obvious. But, that's a function of giving a fifteen minute talk at eight in the morning for a bunch of people who are not walking around holding leashes.
But, overall, it was a good talk. She was very sensitive to community issues and avoided essentializing language (except, of course, the essentalizing language used by the community itself). If anybody's interested, I'm happy to email the author and ask her if she wouldn't mind sending me a copy of her paper.
(And I'm afraid to ask this, but... what do you use a blood pressure cuff for in the context of a scene? Is it for what I think it's for. Because, damn.
It does not help that I am really scared of them.)
(no subject)
Date: 2010-11-19 03:09 pm (UTC)And some of the limits of giving a fifteen minute talk to people who don't necessarily know the first thing about BDSM (outside of pop culture dominatrices*) probably mean being superficial as hell, as you know. (Heck, one of the conferences I go to has 7-8 minute talks, and I'm told the AAS (the big astronomy conference) has 5 minutes, unless you're a grad student presenting dissertation work, when you get 10 or 15. My boss likened it to a commercial -- 'Hi, this is what I do, if it interests you, see me over coffee'. Or else it's to get people to use the poster sessions.)
"And I'm afraid to ask this, but... what do you use a blood pressure cuff for in the context of a scene?"
Well, I'd assume some folks would be turned on by medical role-play, and others might like the ability to incrimentally restrict blood flow, though I'd think they wouldn't be sized well for things other than limbs.
Though right now, thanks to visiting the campus health center, I had to remind myself that there were manual cuffs, rather than the automatic ones the health center uses.
* Which Firefox also knows. 'Dominatrices' pings as correct; 'dominatrixes' doesn't.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-11-19 09:24 pm (UTC)Yeah, it's always a bitch trying to talk about a community that most listeners won't be familiar with. I was really lucky this year, because I was speaking to a crowd of experts about a town they all know and an informant that most of them know personally. But last year I gave a talk on fanfic communities, and oof. I had thirty minutes and still barely had enough time to explain myself.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-11-19 03:27 pm (UTC)Thank you for taking these notes for us! I would be interested in the paper, yeah. <3
(no subject)
Date: 2010-11-19 09:21 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-11-19 05:51 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-11-19 09:18 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-11-21 07:32 pm (UTC)Thank you so much for letting us all attend the talk vicariously!
(no subject)
Date: 2010-11-19 06:50 pm (UTC)I'm not sure how queers are liminal figures in the BDSM community, because as I've seen it they started some parts of it, at least in the Bay Area where I'm from. It was originally queer, but the het folks moved in and started messing around, and now both groups overlap often. Hence the leather contingent in the pride parades.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-11-19 09:19 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-11-19 10:10 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-11-19 10:11 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-11-20 12:19 am (UTC)And yeah, I'm thinking the whole blood pressure cuff is used for cuffing things that probably shouldn't be, including breasts. At least, I think I've seen that done somewhere before...